|
McGoohan: You see, one of the t'ings that is frustrating about making
a piece of entertainment is trying to make it appeal to
everybody. I think this is fatal. I don't think you can do
that. It's done a great deal, you know. We have our horror
movies and we have our science-fiction things. The best
works are those that say...somebody says, "We want to do
something this way," and do it, not because they're aiming at a particular audience. They're doing it because it's a
story they think is important, and is a statement that they
want to make. And they do it and then whoever want to watch
it, that's their privilege. I mean, the painting in an art
gallery, you know, you have a choice whether you go and look
at this one or that one or the other one. You have a choice
not even to go in.
Second Boy: One analogy that comes up, from literature, is with epic
poetry, or with an epic. And "The Prisoner" seems to have
all the qualities that belong to an epic, including the kind
of structure which you ended up with: the thing that began
with seven parts and ended with seventeen.
McGoohan: Yeah.
Second Boy: There have been a few peculiar epic works which have done
that sort of thing or been on the way, Spencer's "Faerie
Queene" for instance, or Tennyson's "Idylls of the Kings"
..."Idylls of the King" which became a twelve-part non-epic
with all the properties and qualities of an epic. I have one
question based on that perhaps peculiar observation, and
that is: one of the figures in some of the epics, like the
"Faerie Queene," is the dwarf who accompanies Una and the
Redcrosse Knight where the idea for Angelo Muscat come from?
McGoohan: Oh. I don't know. Where did that come from?
Second Boy: Is there a literary image...
McGoohan: No, I certainly never thought of one. There were all sorts
of interpretations to little Angelo. He's a very sweet man
and...a very, very sweet man. It's this sort of...there
should be something also--sinister about him. I mean, there
was always the possibility that he might be No. 1. See, I
don't know if anyone...do you pick up that at all? I don't
know, but that...because he was such a good friend and
always by the side of No. 6, that there was...should have
been an implication that perhaps he was a sinister
character, and particularly in the last episode, when he
goes...he's the one that goes out with No. 6 and they go
into the...Maybe he's over No. 1 somewhere...you know they
have so...they have stars, superstars, and what are they
gonna call them next? Comets? So what...maybe he's a comet
or something, little...little Angelo. So there should be
that remaining sinister thing about it.
Second Boy: I was just curious, because there were so many images of
all...of all the figures that are in the series that
are...that have literary connections, whether of not they're
deliberate...(McGoohan: Yeah.)...deliberately connected or
not doesn't really matter, does it? There might be an
element...
McGoohan: No, I don't think...I don't think it does.
Second Boy: No, doesn't matter at all.
McGoohan: I don't think, in that sort of...I, I use the work
"surrealistic" about it...thing, that one has to tie up all
the loose ends. I think there's...that you...options are
open for the beholder to interpret whichever way he likes.
Third Boy: Mr. McGoohan, my question deals with religion.
McGoohan: Yeah.
Third Boy: I understand, in reading a little about you, that you're a
very religious man, and my question pertains to "Fall Out."
I have interpreted a lot of the acts as being...having this
content. I'm thinking specifically of the crucifixion of the
two rebels, of when their arms are drawn apart, the
temptation of No. 6 by the President of the Village, of the
temptation of Christ...
McGoohan: They give him the throne.
Third Boy: "Drybones," all of that. First of all, would you agree with
my idea that that is intentional? That it is...
McGoohan: Ah, answering: No, I had never any religious inspiration for
that whatsoever. I was just trying to make it dramatically
feasible. Certainly the temptation with the guy putting me
up on the throne and all this stuff, ah...it's Lucifer time.
But I never thought at that moment. Maybe somewhere in the
back of my mind it was there, "And the hip bone's connected
to the thigh bone" thing. I just thought it was a very good
song for the situation and also was applicable to the young
man because, as you know, it's easy for us to go astray in
youth and he was astray and he's trying to get everything
together again.
Third Boy: When I speak of religion, I mean a moral attitude towards
life.
McGoohan: I would think that's necessary, yeah.
Third Boy: OK, then, is it fair to say that No. 6 draws upon that? Is
that the source of his defense? Is that how he gets up in
the morning and faces another day in the Village?
McGoohan: I think that's a very good comment and I think that's
probably true, yeah...moral force which says, "I have a
spirit of my own, a soul of my own and it's not all my own
because it's joined with a greater force beyond me." I don't
think he got up every morning and analyzed it to that
extent, but I think that that force is within him and anyone
who is able to fight in that individual way.
Third Boy: Would you say that there is a distinct lack in the rest of
the villagers? Are they soulless beings?
McGoohan: Ah, the majority of them have been sort of brain- washed.
Their souls have been brainwashed out of them. Watching too
many commercials is what happened to them.
Troyer: I used to think that television commercials were spiritually
healthy because they made us skeptical and that that was
probably a very good thing to learn very early on.
McGoohan: Well, they don't make enough people skeptical because if
they made enough people skeptical, the people who were made
skeptical wouldn't be buying all the junk that they're
advertising and then they'd be out of business.
Fourth Boy: There's one sequence you do with Leo McKern where he says,
"I'll kill you." You say, "I'll die," and he says, "You're
dead." Is that a figure of speech or was there an underlying
thing happening there?
McGoohan: Now you're talking about 'Once Upon A Time'?
Fourth Boy: Yeah, 'Once Upon a Time'.
McGoohan: Well, that was very interesting that one...(which was
probably my favourite earlier on, Warner. That was probably
it.) That was one that was written in the 36 hour period.
And Leo McKern, who was a very good friend of mine and a
very fine actor I think, came in on short notice to do it,
and it was mainly a two hander. The brainwashing thing, he
was trying to brainwash me and in the end No. 6 turns the
tables. And the dialogue was very peculiar because all it
consisted of was mainly "Six, Six, Six," and five pages of
that at one time. And Leo, one lunchtime, went up to his dressing room and I went to see the rushes and I knew he was
tired. I went up to the dressing room to tell him how good I
thought he'd been in the rushes. And he was curled up in the
fetus position on his couch there, and he says, "Go away! Go
away you bastard! I don't want to see you again." I said,
"What are you talking about?" He says, "I've just ordered
two doctors," he says, "and they're comin' over as soon as
they can." He says, "Go away." And he had. He'd ordered two
doctors and they come over that afternoon and he didn't work
for 3 days. He's gone! He'd cracked, which was very
interesting. He'd truly cracked. And so I had to use a
double, the back of a guy's head for a lot and eventually
Leo did come back and we completed them and also he was in
the final episode, so he forgave me for everything, but he
did crack, very interesting, I thought....
Troyer: Much as he cracked in that final episode.
McGoohan: Same, exactly the same.
Troyer: I was wondering about how much intensity there was in that. I
know that acting is always an enormously intense experience
but in that head-on two hander where there was so much
dynamic pressure. Obviously, it was real.
McGoohan: It was 8 days shooting and for most of those 8 days we were
head to head on from 8 o'clock in the morning 'til 6:30 at
night with an hour for lunch. So, it was pretty intense. It
was psychiatrist couch time, sort of thing.
Troyer: Were you a different person when you came out the other end of
that series?
McGoohan: Tired, that's all.
Troyer: Beyond that?
McGoohan: No, no....
Troyer: It wasn't purely psychoanalysis?
McGoohan: No, no, I never let any part that I play sort of take over.
I think that that's nonsense when that happens. I think you
should be able to go in and do it, learn your lines and do
it. Some are more fatiguing that others, some are more
emotionally exhausting than others. I mean, you can't play
Hamlet without being drained or King Lear without being
drained but to say that you lived through the day playing
Lear or playing Hamlet before you go out the next night and
go on to the stage, I think that's ludicrous.
Troyer: What about the notions that some actors, some people in other
creative endeavors have, that we all have a finite bank of
energy that each time one brings some of it up there's a
little less left for next time, or for the other end of the
road.
McGoohan: I think that the contrary is true. When one looks at people
such as Arthur Rubenstein, people with tremendous talents
and they are young men. They're young men at 75, they're
young, 80 they're young! Their vitality, in fact, increases.
Their energy increases. It just happens, I mean the force.
The adrenalin increases. It just happens that the machinery
of the body, the parts, the spare parts are wearing out a
little bit...I think it increases and I know a lot of old
folks who are young, young people.
Troyer: So the creative urge is a muscle, the more we flex it, the
stronger it gets.
McGoohan: I think so, yeah. Yeah. It's just this stuff wears out.
That's all.
Fifth Boy: Mr. McGoohan, when you began "The Prisoner," you began it
in a decade in which a lot of people were used to secret
agents. You very neatly saw the next decade coming. I thing
you saw Watergate; the enemy within as opposed to the enemy
without. I don't know if you can answer this, but if you
were going to do the series again and you had to look aged
to the 80's and you were thinking in terms of what you see
as being the real enemy, not the storybook enemy but the
enemy that's really going to hassle us. If you were going to
look into the 80's now, what would you look to?
McGoohan: I think progress is the biggest enemy on earth, apart from
oneself, and that goes with oneself, a two-handed pair with
oneself and progress. I think we're gonna take good care of
this planet shortly. They're making bigger and better bombs,
faster planes, and all this stuff one day, I hate to say it,
there's never been a weapon created yet on the face of the
Earth that hadn't been used and that thing is gonna be used
unless...I don't know how we're gonna stop it, not it's too
late, I think.
Fifth Boy: Do you think maybe there's going to be a strong popular
reaction against "Progress" in the future?
McGoohan: No, because we're run by the Pentagon, we're run by Madison
Avenue, we're run by television, and as long as we accept
those things and don't revolt we'll have to go along with
the stream to the eventual avalanche.
Sixth Boy: We tend to view the threat, the Village there, as sort of a
thing as something external like Madison Avenue, the media.
How responsible are we for accepting this? Where do we
become involved in being "unfree"?
McGoohan: Buying the product, to excess. As long as we go out and buy
stuff, we're at their mercy. We're at the mercy of the
advertiser and of course there are certain things that we
need, but a lot of the stuff that is bought is not needed.
Sixth Boy: Did you regard the Village as an external thing or as
something that we carry around with us all the time?
McGoohan: It was meant to be both. The external was the symbol, but
it's within us all I think, don't you? This surrealist
aspect; we all live in a little Village.
Troyer: Do we?
McGoohan: Your village may be different from other people's villages
but we are all prisoners.
Troyer: Well, I know who the idiot is in mine.
McGoohan: Yes, Number One - same as me.
Seventh Boy: Is No. 1 the evil side of man's nature?
McGoohan: The greatest enemy that we have...No. 1 was depicted as an
evil, governing force in this Village. So, who is this No.
1? We just see the No. 2's, the sidekicks. Now this
overriding, evil force is at its most powerful within
ourselves and we have constantly to fight it, I think, and
that is why I made No. 1 an image of No. 6. His other half,
his alter ego.
Troyer: Did you know when you first outlined the series in your own
mind, the concept that No. 1 was going to turn out to be
you, to be No. 6?
McGoohan: No, I didn't. That's an interesting question.
Troyer: When did you find out?
McGoohan: When it got very close to the last episode and I hadn't
written it yet. And I had to sit down this terrible day and
write the last episode and I knew it wasn't going to be
something out of James Bond, and in the back of my mind
there was some parallel with the character Six and the No. 1
and the rest. And then, I didn't even know exactly 'til I
was about the third through the script, the last script.
Troyer: How about you colleagues, the other writers. Were they
surprised?
McGoohan: Yep.
Troyer: Were they annoyed?
McGoohan: No.
Troyer: Did they decide it was untidy?
McGoohan: No, they used to come along from time to time and say,
"Who's No. 1?" you see. And I told them , "It's a secret"
until I actually sat down and wrote it - and it was,
actually; they didn't know until I handed out the script.
Troyer: But were they disappointed by that...?
McGoohan: No, they liked it. They said they always knew it was going
to be him.
Troyer: (laughs) Once you told them.
McGoohan: Few of them did really. Nobody really knew. No.
Troyer: Why the double mask? Why the monkey face?
McGoohan: Oh, dear. Yeah, well, we're all supposed to come from these
things, you know. It's the same with the penny farthing
symbol bicycle thing. Progress. I don't think we've
progressed much. But the monkey thing was, according to
various theories extant today, that we all come from the
original ape, so I just used that as a symbol, you know. The
bestial thing and then the other bestial face behind it
which was laughing, jeering and jabbering like a monkey.
Eighth Boy: Mr. McGoohan, during the last episode, Fall Out, we see
the Prisoner. He's smiling and laughing and dancing for the
first time and yet later on the very last scene is exactly
the some as the very first scene where he's driving off with
his familiar stern face. My question is, has the Prisoner
between the first and the last episode actually changed any?
McGoohan: Ah, no, I think he's essentially the same. I think he got
slightly exhilarated by the fact that he got out of this
mythical place and felt like doing a little skip and a
dance, and singing a bit, and felt very happy to be going
home with his little buddy, the Butler, you know. And we
never did a cut of him when that door opened. We just saw
the door open and he went in. So, you never knew whether his
exhilaration was lost when he saw that sinister door that
was left like an unfinished symphony.
Ninth Boy: In the final episode, does the Prisoner really consider
becoming the leader of the Village?
McGoohan: No. He does not. He just wants to get out and he uses a
technique which he hadn't used before that, which was
violence, which is sad, but he does; and that's how he gets
out and then, of course, in the final episode, he goes back
to his little apartment place and he has his little valet
guy with him and the door opens on its own when he goes in
the car. There you know it's gonna start over again because
we continue to be Prisoners.
Ninth Boy: And that leads to my last question, what would the Prisoner
be likely to do with his newfound freedom?
McGoohan: He hasn't got it. Which is the whole point. When that door
opens on its own and there's no one behind it, exactly the
same as all the doors in the Village open, you know that
somebody's waiting in there to start it all over again. He's
got no freedom. Freedom is a myth. There's no final
conclusion to it. Ah, and I was very fortunate to be able to
do something as audacious as that with no final conclusion
to it because people do want the word "THE END" put up
there. Now the final two words for that thing should have
been "THE BEGINNING".
Troyer: This is kind of a banal question, I guess, but if you could
leave one sentence or paragraph in the head of everyone who
watched the Prisoner series, the whole series, one thing for
them to carry around for awhile, when it was over, what
would it be?
McGoohan: Be seeing you.
Troyer: Just that?...enigmatic to the end.
McGoohan: Be seeing you. That means quite a lot.
Troyer: It does indeed.
McGoohan: Be seeing you. Yeah.
|